ext_85243 ([identity profile] gillen.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] deathboy 2008-03-30 01:57 am (UTC)

How is by offering up a choice between a charismatic but inexperienced black man and the most unpopular woman in America who thinks going on baby-kissing junkets as the First Lady equates to foreign policy experience as their candidate to run against a war hero with 25 years in the Senate and a reputation for taking on corruption.

If they'd wanted to win the election, they should have run Al Gore. After all, he won last time - and back then he didn't have his Nobel prize or Oscar.

But I'm sure they'll find some way to blame it all on Ralph Nader.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting