cost of living
May. 31st, 2005 01:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Canada Red Cross used HIV blood (which is old news from the 80s, but it's regarding the settlement)
More than 3,000 people have died since getting the tainted blood in the 1980s.
read to the bottom...
The Red Cross now faces a fine up to C$5,000 (£2,180) and will donate C$1.5m (£654,000) towards medical research and educational scholarships.
$500 for a Canadian life?
286 GB pounds?
That's pretty cheap.
More than 3,000 people have died since getting the tainted blood in the 1980s.
read to the bottom...
The Red Cross now faces a fine up to C$5,000 (£2,180) and will donate C$1.5m (£654,000) towards medical research and educational scholarships.
$500 for a Canadian life?
286 GB pounds?
That's pretty cheap.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 12:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 12:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 12:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 12:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 01:21 pm (UTC)286 GB pounds?
That's pretty cheap.
Oh, the pointlessness of fining charities or government departments. All you'd be doing would be fining the donors or the taxpayers, the organisation itself isn't profitmaking, it doesn't have any money of its own, per se, so... what's the point?
Then counterbalance with the number of lives that might be saved/improved by using the money if you DIDN'T fine them.
In situations like this, management need to be held personally criminally liable, even if that liabilty is shared between several managers. I say this as a manager.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 02:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 02:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 04:50 pm (UTC)moving to usa in a few months however. i dont see whats wrong with canada.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 08:22 pm (UTC)Their only option would have been to dump all the blood, and then most of those people would have died at the time.
The last statistic I heard was that the hemopheliacs were 3% of the blood users, but 90% of the consumption. They would have had to dent all of them access to blood in order to keep the supply their for emergency use. Since this is illegal under the health act, the people handling the blood decided to take their chances.
I didn't follow it right to the conclusion, so how I remember it might be off a bit.
wwm.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 09:58 pm (UTC)Did I tell you about the time we got some eyeballs by mistake?