Not a fecking hope. Unless by "hardware" you mean a clockwork processor and a squigabyte of RAM. XP may or may not "run" faster than W2K or NT4, but it _certainly_ needs a far bigger playpen to do it in. If you try to run XP on a "typical" memory rigout of 2001, then you're in for a good thrashing.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-29 10:46 am (UTC)