Date: 2007-01-29 10:46 am (UTC)
Not a fecking hope. Unless by "hardware" you mean a clockwork processor and a squigabyte of RAM. XP may or may not "run" faster than W2K or NT4, but it _certainly_ needs a far bigger playpen to do it in. If you try to run XP on a "typical" memory rigout of 2001, then you're in for a good thrashing.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

October 2021

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 04:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios