Jehova's Witnesses
Feb. 13th, 2005 10:59 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Just reading up on Jehova's Witnesses as Liz mentioned that at least some of them don't celebrate birthdays (or several other Christian or general celebration times) - though I also found some sites refuting the reasoning behind this and saying that not everyone follows this doctrine.
I hadn't actually known all that much about them, other than that, as a youngster, my mom and dad had been to the USA, where dad had, for whatever reason, been interested in their church. Ever since then, we were visited maybe every six months by representatives who'd come round, have a talk and play us a video. Until I was about 10, I think, maybe longer than that.
Eventually, they stopped sending people (I think it became obvious that finally, my parents had gone off the idea), but they re-established contact a bit later when a family moved into our street. That made it even harder to ask them to leave, as they were good people, and our neighbours, and only doing what their faith told them, but I assume my folks had heard enough to know they weren't interested.
'Shows what good their educational videos and chats did to me as a kid - I can't remember anything whatsoever, except being a bit bored, and one about a puppy that died, which made me quite upset.
Reading around on the web, it reads (rather cynically) as though the whole thing was invented by Charles Russell to sell religious literature. Watchtower's still going strong, he must have been a bright lad.
I felt a bit sorry for the Jehova's Witness kids I met when I was young (only a few, I have to say) - they had the piss taken out of them by the rest of us (for the crime of being different, of course), and weren't allowed to socialise with us. Add to that the whole faith-spreading duties, seems a tough gig.
I can see why some of the tenets would appeal, there are a few differences that would make sense to an existing Christian (more sense, in fact), but there seem to be just as many ideas that are even harder to accept than the mainstream equivalent.
Next week on "things Scott gets suddenly interested in, then rambles about at length": Zoroastrianism! Bring an egg!
I hadn't actually known all that much about them, other than that, as a youngster, my mom and dad had been to the USA, where dad had, for whatever reason, been interested in their church. Ever since then, we were visited maybe every six months by representatives who'd come round, have a talk and play us a video. Until I was about 10, I think, maybe longer than that.
Eventually, they stopped sending people (I think it became obvious that finally, my parents had gone off the idea), but they re-established contact a bit later when a family moved into our street. That made it even harder to ask them to leave, as they were good people, and our neighbours, and only doing what their faith told them, but I assume my folks had heard enough to know they weren't interested.
'Shows what good their educational videos and chats did to me as a kid - I can't remember anything whatsoever, except being a bit bored, and one about a puppy that died, which made me quite upset.
Reading around on the web, it reads (rather cynically) as though the whole thing was invented by Charles Russell to sell religious literature. Watchtower's still going strong, he must have been a bright lad.
I felt a bit sorry for the Jehova's Witness kids I met when I was young (only a few, I have to say) - they had the piss taken out of them by the rest of us (for the crime of being different, of course), and weren't allowed to socialise with us. Add to that the whole faith-spreading duties, seems a tough gig.
I can see why some of the tenets would appeal, there are a few differences that would make sense to an existing Christian (more sense, in fact), but there seem to be just as many ideas that are even harder to accept than the mainstream equivalent.
Next week on "things Scott gets suddenly interested in, then rambles about at length": Zoroastrianism! Bring an egg!
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 11:15 pm (UTC)Next week scientology!
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 12:15 am (UTC)She's really rad.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 05:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 09:00 am (UTC)Ah well, I guess it's better than a religion that was started as a bet.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 11:39 am (UTC)Another religious concept that should be banned is "life after death". Religions which include this make it too easy to justify killing and suicide, and also make it easy to make excuses for not caring or being unpleasant ("it doesn't matter, I'll be better in the next life"). They also tend to develop unpleasant cults worshipping the dead and have violent/sick imagery (idols in execution poses, glorification of death etc).
no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 12:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 12:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 12:33 pm (UTC)Always look at who makes sacrifices and who benefits from them.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 11:05 pm (UTC)