(no subject)
Jun. 23rd, 2005 04:44 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The Wall Street Journal vs. The Scientific Consensus
A WSJ editorial seems to fly in the face of scientific consensus, painting a much watered down picture of the global climate problems, and attempting to discredit those who say we're heading for a man-made catastrophe.
[link nicked from
malcubed]
A WSJ editorial seems to fly in the face of scientific consensus, painting a much watered down picture of the global climate problems, and attempting to discredit those who say we're heading for a man-made catastrophe.
[link nicked from
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-23 04:17 pm (UTC)We have two different thermometers here on the farm, both in the shade, and both put the temperature here at 34c two days ago. I just checked environment Canada for the two closest centers, and they both had the high for the day at 28c (one 28.3, one 28.4).
While I was still living in Edmonton, the oficial temperature was never what the temperature actually was. Not that the forecast low for the city center has any bearing on the temperature outside the head island all that concrete causes, but the highs should have been the same in the suburbs.
wwm.