(no subject)

[deathboy]

The Wall Street Journal vs. The Scientific Consensus

A WSJ editorial seems to fly in the face of scientific consensus, painting a much watered down picture of the global climate problems, and attempting to discredit those who say we're heading for a man-made catastrophe.

[link nicked from malcubed]

Comments

[failed-bard.livejournal.com]

My problem with the kyoto accord, apart from the lack of legitimacy to the claims, is that it ignores the fact that the increase in co2 levels has more to do with global deforestation (and the loss of algae due to oceanic pollution) than it does with fossil fuels. Even without gas, the worlds 6+ billion people are still going to breathe, and every time they do they make it worse.

So, the real solution involves either reforestation or genocide, your pick.

wwm.