RIGHTO, SHUT THE FUCK UP.

[deathboy]

OK. We're all clever people, right?

Right.

Question:

Is there an organisation that will take someone who is suitably committed and give them the wherewithal to assassinate the prime-minister of the UK?

Blair needs some serious death and I'm more than happy to die in the process of slaughtering the shit-fucking lying, genocidal, self-serving bastard.

Bush ALSO *totally* needs assassinating.

If *anyone* can come up with a plan that simply involved *my death*, but that promises *the death of George W Bush*, or Tony Blair, I will sign up.

Please, please, please, fucking PLEASE, give me a way to stop either one of these fucking shitheads.

ALL AMERICANS DESERVE TO FUCKING DIE BECAUSE OF THEIR SHIT-FUCKING PATHETIC AND DISGUSTING REACTION TO BEING GOVERNED BY A TOTALITARIAN SHIT-FUCKER THAT RIGGED THE ELECTIONS.

ALL UK-CITIZENS DESERVE TO DIE FOR NOT INSTANTLY ASSASSINATING TONY "SHITFUCKING POODLE" BLAIR GIVEN HOW FUCKING EASY IT WOULD BE. WE ARE **BRITISH** FOR FUCK'S SAKE. LET'S JUST LOOK AT HOW FUCKING PATHETIC THAT LOOKS NOW.

I need a gun and an opportunity.

I can shoot quite well, and I'll die to kill either of these bastards.

---

To the people of Iraq:

- I only hope as many innocent Americans and British citizens die as do your people.

- I pray the gods take Britain as fully as the USA deserves to be exterminated.

---

Sleep time.

I pray to die before I wake.

Comments

[chopstx.livejournal.com]

u may be just the person im looking for...

[smidget.livejournal.com]

What if you shot Hussein instead? Then Bush would die of happiness, you could blame it on Blair and get him shot, and nobody else would have to worry about starting another war over Hussein's power?

[stevenothing.livejournal.com]

Apparently he's got any one of a number of sons, who are just as bad as he is, to take his place. So assasinating him wouldn't really do any good.
And again, I get the feeling that were bush or blair removed, that another similarly minded person would step into their still smoking shoes.

Peace? My humble opinions:

[ex-bison95.livejournal.com]

erm dude O_O

Have you ever seen that comedy series that used to be on channel 4, with the German tourist in England? He sees your regular Englishman walking down the street and then he gets down on his knees and apologises for Hitler's crimes, the crimes of his forefathers, the crimes of his nation, etc, etc, etc? It was funny because everyone knew that this guy had nothing to do with what happened back then, yet he felt so strongly that he was the cause and that he carried the sins of the previous generation.

Blair is doing exactly what the UK needs in a time of recession; he's looking out for the UK's best interests and unfortunately that lies completely in America. I believe that's why the puppet is backing America 1000% without batting an eyelid. It also means that the spoils of the battle are shared unequally with him (yummy...the world's 2nd largest oil supply!)

The American public are drones. Take a ganders at CNN and Fox News someday and you'll find out exactly why the majority think the way they think. It's full of errors, scaremongering, lies and deciet and they buy into it without thinking.

And the British, well unfortunately we're all brought up to be the best of Britain. Like Julian_Bashir once said....if we have issues with someone the worst we do is not invite them to tea. Unlike the Americans we haven't been taught to complain or speak out and make apublic scene; and it clearly shows.


Anyways, where was I? Oh yeah . . .

Calm down ^_^


Currently I'm having issues with certain people. A "friend" of mine is currently making himself heard as an "Iraqi who supports the war with the US against Iraq" If you think Blair and Bush are bad checkout his website; hack it and then knock it offline ;] http://iprospect.org.uk/ (I am severely irritated by him and his stance; he totally undermines the antiwar effort >_< !!!) If you read the media archives he has he skews the news like nobody's business; you'd think ALL arabs supported his views whereas the reality is that very very few support him! (GRR on TV he makes it sound like he has unilateral support.) His name's Yasser Alaskeri...read this to see his stance on the issue: http://www.opendemocracy.net/debates/article.jsp?id=2&debateId=88&articleId=852

Re: Peace? My humble opinions:

[aeryk.livejournal.com]

Haha. I like that, the American public being taught to complain or speak out and make a public scene. We are taught to shut up, obey and fight on, just like everyone else.

[ex-bison95.livejournal.com]

You should compare the American Jerry Springer Show with the UK version to see what I mean ;]


Public opinion means a lot more in Americathan it does here. That's the reason why the news over there sucks, it's tailored to control the public and sway opinions to the far right. The same can't be said of the UK imho.

Re:

[aeryk.livejournal.com]

Hmm... Could be. Unfortunately, I've never been to the UK, and more fortunately I've never been a fan of watching TV from other country (aside from Monty Python, Red Dwarf, and a couple others of 'course), so I can't really judge.

kill your tv

[aeryk.livejournal.com]

other country = either country.

Re: Peace? My humble opinions:

[(Anonymous)]

> checkout his website; hack it and then knock it offline

Yeah, suppressing opposition speech is just one of the many reason's we're gonna get Saddam.

Verbose Reply - Part 1:

[ex-bison95.livejournal.com]

Wow . . . Somebody doesn't have a sense of humour ;]



Hacking is illegal and an offence; I wouldn't ask anybody to do so seriously. I hope you know that.

By posting up the URL and asking people to "check it out" I'm hardly "suppressing opposition speech" am I?

It's incredible and most ironic that you seem to think a war against Iraq has some humanitarian value to it. That somehow Saddam's suppression of opposition-speech is one reason amongst many why a war is imminent. Are you American...you certainly sound like one quote: "we're gonna get Saddam". You're not gonna get Saddam; you are gonna get the Iraqi people and you most certainly aren't doing all of this in a vain attempt to rid the world of terror and suppressive regimes; currently the world is fearing bush's intervention and international policies; it seems the most terror is being spawned by America itself.

You want to discuss suppression; let's discuss the thousands of people being placed into "custody" in America by America because they happen to be Arab's during these "difficult times". Don't get me wrong; afterall you're doing this to save your nation in these difficult times. But don't start spewing forth democratic rhetoric that simply isn't being upheld at all times. Like I said before; I don't blame America for imprisoning people; they did the same to the Japanese during WW2. Have you ever checked out the Bush_Sucks (http://www.livejournal.com/users/bush_sucks) LJ community? Leftist shite propoganda or "Anti-American" is possibly what you'd call it; heck if you're Jewish you'd probably yell "anti-semetic" and place these people alongside those who "back Saddam" and the PLO. I suggest you read the series of posts there and then tell me whether your president's international policies were designed to help protect freedom of speech (heck america and freedom of speech, DMCA, RIAA, etc . . . now there's a laugh!)


The person who owns and updates that specific website btw is a "friend" of mine. The main issue I have with it is that he's using his nationality as propoganda material that fuels bush/blair's war against Iraq. He approaches the media by saying he is an Iraqi organisation that actually backs a war against Iraq, unsurprisingly right wing propoganda will immediately snap him up. His website is riddled with inaccurate information that seems to indicate the majority of Arabs and to a greater extent Iraqis supporting him and supporting a War against Iraq (which as an Iraqi I know is not true at all.) I've even heard Jack Straw using him as a scapegoat saying "see; the Iraqi people want this to happen, they need us". I know the guy personally; I went to Hajj with him a few weeks ago. He takes a very hard line with this regards and backs up his statements with historical facts yet incredibly misses out the main issue which is that Saddam was put in power by the US and kept in power by the US for decades! You can't seek a solution to Saddam from the US; the Iraqi people's best interests are far from the US's best interests.

Verbose Reply - Part 2:

[ex-bison95.livejournal.com]

That isn't to say we don't share the same agendas. As an Iraqi I want to get rid of Saddam; I've wanted this since before you knew about a Saddam; I've been campaining for Saddam's removal for 15 years now; I've helped publish a book on the atrocities commited by him! But as an Iraqi I do not want a war against my people, my family and my relatives in my country. I do not want you to drop depleted Uraniam shells with a half life expectancy of 500,000 years on my land resulting in unheard of cancers appearing nationwide, I do not want you to impose sanctions on my country that are against the Geneva convention and that is resulting in the deaths of half a million Iraqi children (which of course the US denies). You give me the choice between dying at Saddam's hands and dying at your hands what do you expect me to say? It's like giving me the choice between having two terminal cancers; my best reply is that I want neither. I do not want Saddam NOR do I want a war by the US!

Am I anti-american for not wanting a war against Iraq? Am I a supporter of Saddam for not wanting a war against Iraq? It's like comparing apples and oranges...they aren't related.

--
You have the right to freedom of speech, freedom of religion, from want from fear . . . those rights would not exist without a fifth right; the freedom to protect all other rights by any means necessary. - Splinter Cell

Re: Verbose Reply - Part 2:

[echo-echo.livejournal.com]

Well put.

[flatlineloki.livejournal.com]

I'm down for a lil' ultra-violence . . . right, let's do it. You find me a nuke, I'll strap it to my back and head for the White house while you take care of Blair.

The family will be down 2 good souls, but hey . . . maybe not. We can't die from conventional weaponry anyways, right? ;)

[bangbangkitten.livejournal.com]

See... I am an American (WE SUCK). And because of the fact there isn't shit I can do about this I just keep my nose out of it. I don't even watch the news anymore. Hopefully they will blow us to bits and I won't have to hear anymore about the bull. Now as for Bush... well, had I lived in DC, I (along w/ the rest of my family) would have made an attempt to take his ass out long time ago. But there are those damned pesky SService men. They seem to upset my plans.

[fross.livejournal.com]

most of the rest of america didnt vote for him either. heh.

if the situation had been anywhere else ("my brother, he fix it for me!") we'd have been wading in with guns and bombs in the name of democracy.

anyway. only a couple of years til you can vote him out. and THIS time, don't fuck it up!

[paarsley.livejournal.com]

You do realise that you could get a knock on the door from a certain government agency for that 'incitement to assassinate' ;)

[pda.livejournal.com]

ace! bring it on! :D

[tga.livejournal.com]

ALL AMERICANS DESERVE TO FUCKING DIE

I fucking love you too!!!

[hexadb.livejournal.com]

Bah you're not "an american", you're "THE american" :)


I just finished reading Stupid White Men, and felt much the same way re: assasinating someone/doing *something* drastic. it makes me mmmmmaaaa-mmmaaa MAAAAD!!!!

[(Anonymous)]

Scott, go and have a wank and forget about it.

[themadcatlady.livejournal.com]

WE ARE **BRITISH** FOR FUCK'S SAKE

I'm not British, but I'm totally with you mate. Now, how much would it cost (if every one of us chipped in a bit) to hire a professional assassin???

[herdivineshadow]

I have guns but really crap aim. Sorry

[echo-echo.livejournal.com]

Anyway, you would turn them both into martyrs and galvanise their standpoint they have because instead of blaming you they would blame "a terrorist".

[markeris.livejournal.com]

I fail to see the distinction here.

Is it when someone assasinates a head of state they are a terrorist - unless it`s one of your mates, at which point you go, aw, it was only Scott and it doesn`t count?

[echo-echo.livejournal.com]

No, in the sense that they would spectacularly fail to catch anyone for it and blame the "axis of evil" or whatever damned name they think sells better copy.